RESUMO
Helminths are a major health concern as over one billion people are infected worldwide and, despite the multiple efforts made, there is still no effective human vaccine against them. The most important drugs used nowadays to control helminth infections belong to the benzimidazoles, imidazothiazoles (levamisole) and macrocyclic lactones (avermectins and milbemycins) families. However, in the last 20 years, many publications have revealed increasing anthelmintic resistance in livestock which is both an economical and a potential health problem, even though very few have reported similar findings in human populations. To deal with this worrying limitation of anthelmintic drugs, alternative treatments based on plant extracts or probiotics have been developed. Probiotics are defined by the Food and Agriculture Organization as live microorganisms, which, when consumed in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit to the host. It has been proven that probiotic microbes have the ability to exert an immunomodulatory effect both at the mucosa and the systemic level. The immune response against gastrointestinal helminths is characterized as a type 2 response, with high IgE levels, increased numbers and/or activity of Th2 cells, type 2 innate lymphoid cells, eosinophils, basophils, mast cells, and alternatively activated macrophages. The oral administration of probiotics may contribute to controlling gastrointestinal helminth infections since it has been demonstrated that these microorganisms stimulate dendritic cells to elicit a type 2 or regulatory immune response, among other effects on the host immune system. Here we review the current knowledge about the use of probiotic bacteria as anthelmintic therapy or as a complement to traditional anthelmintic treatments. Considering all research papers reviewed, we may conclude that the effect generated by probiotics on helminth infection depends not only on the parasite species, their stage and localization but also on the administration scheme.
RESUMO
The immunogenicity and protective efficacy of recombinant SurA (rSurA) and rDnaK from Brucella spp. were evaluated in BALB/c mice. Immunization with rSurA in adjuvant induced a vigorous immunoglobulin G (IgG) response, with higher IgG2a than IgG1 titers. In addition, after in vitro stimulation with rSurA, spleen cells from rSurA-immunized mice produced interleukin-2 (IL-2), interferon (IFN)-gamma, IL-4 and IL-5. Immunization with rDnaK plus adjuvant induced a strong humoral response resulting in similar anti-rDnaK IgG titers than immunization with rDnaK alone. IgG2a titers predominated over IgG1 in mice injected with rDnaK alone or rDnaK plus adjuvant. Spleen cells from mice immunized with rDnaK plus adjuvant secreted IFN-gamma and IL-2 upon stimulation with rDnaK and induced a specific cytotoxic response. On the contrary, mice immunized with rDnaK alone did not exhibit a specific T helper or cytotoxic response in vitro. Mice given rSurA or rDnaK with adjuvant exhibited a significant degree of protection whereas immunization with rDnaK alone induced a low but still statistically significant level of protection against B. abortus infection. All studied vaccines were less protected than mice immunized with H38 or B. abortus strain 19 control vaccines. Altogether these results suggest that rSurA or rDnaK induce partial protection against B. abortus infection and could be useful candidates for the development of subunit vaccines against brucellosis.
